Why couldn’t it be a unicorn?

The snaps from the late 1930s were tiny, perhaps an inch by an inch and a half. A couple appear to be from the summer of 1938.

My father, born in December 1936 is about eighteen months old. He is standing in the family garden at 6 Cavendish Road, Chiswick. The impression of it being summer is created by the growth of creepers against the garden fence and by the fact that my father has bare legs and arms.

Scanning the photograph and increasing its size, there appeared to be an animal standing in front of the toddler, beside whose left foot there seems to be a basket or a trug.

“A monkey,” I exclaimed. “There was a monkey in the garden.”

“Anything would have been possible,” my mother responded. “Grandfather Bennett might have brought home all sorts.”

“Are you sure it’s not a dog?” asked a friend, looking at the electronic image.

The idea of the monkey was much more appealing, exotic stories are always much more interesting.

There would have been something somehow life affirming in the idea of my great grandfather arriving home from the dairy with a monkey.

Born in Bellary in 1878, he had been the son of a quartermaster sergeant in the British army who retired when my great grandfather was eight years old and who had died a few months later. Surmounting challenges, my great grandfather survived being shot in the face, abdomen and thigh whilst cutting barbed wire on 21st October 1917 in the quagmire of No Man’s Land in Flanders.

The thought that a man who had been through such times would have retained such a degree of levity to return from his milk round to his west London home with a monkey suggested an irrepressible spirit.

My sister looked at the picture.

Being an English rationalist and most definitely an adherent of the principles set forth by William of Occam, whose metaphorical razor cut through false assumptions. My sister was sceptical at the suggestion of it being a monkey.

A close examination led to a clear conclusion. “A Pomeranian dog, definitely a dog.”

“A Pomeranian tree dog?” I queried.

“No, just a Pomeranian dog.”

Why does the rational explanation always have to be the right one?

A monkey would have inspired imaginings, speculation, laughter at the thought of my grandmother’s response to her father coming home from work with a simian companion.

Sometimes, the unlikely and improbable would be welcome. Who wouldn’t be delighted at seeing a unicorn?

Posted in The stuff of daily life | 2 Comments

The cleansing effect of soaps

Emmerdale has changed from times past. This evening’s episode included a policeman charging a woman with multiple murders, attempted murder, false imprisonment, and assault.

Soaps in the past never had such dramatic occurrences. Life was usually altogether more mundane.

Crossroads was generally mundane but Aunt Nell watched each programme with a devotion that was almost religious. Seated in her armchair, there would have been an expectation that everyone in the room would observe a profound silence as each episode was aired.

One moment is particularly memorable, the departure from the series of Meg Richardson, played by Noelle Gordon. Meg Richardson is thought to have died in a fire, but was then depicted as leaving for New York on the QE2.

Not following the storyline, it is not possible to recall the circumstances of the Transatlantic exit, but what is memorable is Aunt Nell’s reaction of tears and anger, she spoke aloud as she criticized the person whom she held responsible for the fire at the hotel which was initially thought to have caused Meg Richardson’s death.

The moment in question took place in November 1981, more than forty years ago.

In that distant autumn, it seemed reasonable to imagine that Aunt Nell was not typical, yet tales of Crossroads revealed that Aunt Nell’s reaction was shared by many, many viewers.  There were some who were so disturbed by the storyline that they telephoned the television studio, or wrote letters to ATV expressing their annoyance and distress that Meg Richardson would no longer be at the Crossroads Motel.

Perhaps such identification with a fictional character can perform a healthy function, perhaps it allows it allows a displacement of feelings of anger.

Crossroads drew some eighteen million viewers at its peak, among them there would have been countless people for whom a vicarious identification with the dramatis personae of the programme may have allowed a transference of feelings.  The scapegoats they needed for their anger were the imaginary people of a midland hotel, rather than the flesh and blood people around them.

Far better to channel one’s aggression and frustration toward the unreal stories on a television screen than to scapegoat one’s own family members, or friends or colleagues. There is something cathartic in pouring out one’s anger in a way that causes no hurt.

Perhaps the television soaps continue to perform such a function. One cannot imagine so much drama and tragedy befalling such a small cross-section of the population, but perhaps the statistical improbability that so much could befall so few is less important than the fact that the storylines allow viewers the possibility of identifying with the experiences of the characters, that with the unfolding of the plot, people can work through their own feelings, their own hurts, their own imaginings, their own fury.

If an unintended role of the television soap is to assist healthy psychological adjustment, then the reactions to the soaps are healthy for society.

Posted in This sceptred isle | Leave a comment

Eliot and me

T.S. Eliot was always a favourite. Knowledge of his poetry was unnecessary. Anyone who named a poem East Coker, the parish west of Yeovil in which my grandmother lived, was someone who was to be esteemed.

Never mind that the name derived from the fact that Andrew Elliott (with two T’s) had left the parish in 1669 to travel to North America, the choice of the church as the burial place for T.S. Eliot’s ashes some three hundred years after his forebear had departed, marked a literally physical connection with the small Somerset parish.

Little Gidding, which with East Coker is one of the Four Quartets, a set of four poems published over six years by Eliot, includes the familiar lines.

We shall not cease from exploration
And the end of all our exploring
Will be to arrive where we started
And know the place for the first time.
Through the unknown, remembered gate
When the last of earth left to discover
Is that which was the beginning . . .

Eliot’s work is so well-known and so much loved that it seems almost heretical to question its wisdom, but does arriving where we started really mark an end? The suggestion is nuanced by that arrival bringing a knowledge of that place for the first time.

Perhaps journeying must continue until there is such a recognition. Perhaps feeling a return to the starting point is just a further step in a long sequence means a lack of perception of the essence of the place.

Sitting in my father’s armchair, there is recall of visiting him in hospital this week two years ago.  There is a memory of him apologising to my companion for the dishevelled state of his hair. There is a sad remembering of a wish that he might return home and live out peacefully his remaining months.

Perhaps there is an unquietness that will pass in time. Perhaps the many hours of genealogical searching for my great grandfather, the quest for the surname we might have had, is a futile exploring that will reach no end.

The plaque to commemorate T.S. Eliot at East Coker church includes lines from the poem East Coker:

In my beginning is my end.
Of your kindness,
pray for the soul of Thomas Stearns Eliot, poet.
In my end is my beginning.

Beginnings and ends, ends and beginnings: Eliot finds a tranquility, a fulfilment in the circularity of life.

Sitting barely more than a dozen miles from his resting place, such equanimity is elusive.

Posted in The stuff of daily life | 2 Comments

Mad youths

“He went over the hedge with Pammie in the car. He was going down Turn Hill.”

The story was unsurprising.

Pammie was a slim, blonde-haired, blue-eyed head turner. If you were old enough to have had a bank account, you might have gone to the local branch of the National Westminster Bank just to catch a smile from her at the counter. (Being a cousin of some degree, Pammie was also someone towards whom there was a sense of duty to be protective).

He was a legendary figure in our community.  A farmer’s son, he seemed of a generation not inclined to conform to the ways of his forefathers. He was a pointer to a possibility of ways of living very different from the traditional and conservative ways to which our community was accustomed.

It was hard to imagine he would ever have gone out in a sports jacket, corduroy trousers and a flat cap. Rustic fashion would probably not have caught the eye of a bank clerk (and in our community working in a bank represented a level of sophistication far higher than the sort of lives that most of us lived).

Where he was driving Pammie has long ago faded into the mists of the unknown. Perhaps one or the other of them would recall, but it might shatter the mystique of the tale if it was revealed they were simply going to the pub, or, even more mundanely, to the shops. It was the reckless nature of the journeying that was significant.

He was known for his travelling around the roads at speed. The speed was probably modest compared with anything considered fast now. If car went much beyond fifty miles per hour, we thought we were going quickly.

One of his contemporaries was known for his customising of innocuous cars so that they might reach speeds their designers could never have envisaged. It was said that one adaptation of a Land Rover included fitting it with a Rolls Royce Merlin engine from a Spitfire. The story seems improbable, implausible even. Wouldn’t an aircraft engine have shaken to pieces an old Land Rover?

Yet it wouldn’t have mattered to us if the stories were untrue. What mattered was the spirit that they represented, the suggestion that the old ways were not the only ways.

Perhaps mad youths were a feature of every generation – until now. Rebellion has become a rare phenomenon.

 

Posted in Unreliable memories | Leave a comment

Don’t take away the music

The Sixth Year students are nothing, if not eclectic, in their tastes in music. From a Twenty-First Century rap, one switched to playing Stayin’ Alive by The Bee Gees. A discussion ensued about a production of Grease that is to come to Dublin.

Stayin’ Alive came from Saturday Night Fever, which with Grease dominated pop music in the spring and summer of 1978. Being someone who liked neither, it seemed a barren time for music.

I tried to recall perceptions of music in those times. Would we have countenanced playing music from forty-four years previously? Would we even have known music from forty-four years previously? Perhaps fans of blues could have recalled artists from the 1930s, but for the average pop music listener, nothing before the late-1950s would have been thought worth a listen.

I was asked if I had heard of Stevie Nicks. I had to check we were talking about the same person before I said that Fleetwood Mac were a massive band at the time The Bee Gees were dominating the pop charts.

The conversation shifted to what song had changed someone’s life. “Random” would have not been an adequate description for the choice of songs that followed. One student suggested an entire album by The Goo Goo Dolls.

“What song changed your life, sir?” asked one girl.

“I’m not sure,” I said. “I suppose if I had to choose one song, it would be Stay Gold by First Aid Kit.”

“Never heard of them, sir.”

“No, I don’t suppose you would have done. They are a female duo from Sweden.”

The song was from 2014, but when you are eighteen years old, eight years ago can seem like a place that is in a different country. Yet when they were listening to music from the 1970s, 2014 was only yesterday. Perhaps it was simply that the song was from a genre different from those that filled the playlists on their phones.

Can songs really change someone’s life? Aren’t they more just an echo of thoughts a person has already?

There used to be a song called Last night a DJ saved my life. I have no recall of the name of the artist, nor of any of the other of the lyrics. The song title seemed to be a short story in seven words.

I assume that the song was not about any heroic deeds on the night club floor, no resuscitation of an ailing dancer, nor of an extrication from beneath fallen masonry, instead that the selection of a certain song to play brought a change of mood and an opportunity for life to go in another direction.

Perhaps music has such power, perhaps it’s more something for passing time with Sixth Year students who have just finished mock exams.

Posted in The stuff of daily life | Leave a comment