Losing Jerusalem

A warm summer’s afternoon in Glastonbury and the town was full of its eccentric diversity. Yet as as Glastonbury may be, it is a model of sane and peaceable conduct when compared with the world beyond.

From the humdrum existence of a small West Country town in the 1970s, it has undergone a gradual transformation to become a capital city of the esoteric –  and the plain bonkers.

Perhaps it is a fulfilment of G.K. Chesterton’s maxim that ‘when men choose not to believe in God, they do not thereafter believe in nothing, they then become capable of believing in anything.’ Perhaps Glastonbury is the ultimate expression of a society that mingles beliefs in pre-Christian notions of angels and demons, with Eastern ideas of karma and reincarnation, and secular attachments to conspiracy theories. Perhaps Glastonbury has replaced Christian orthodoxy with an a la carte menu of all religions and none.

The ‘whatever you’re having yourself’ approach might allow people to pick whatever they want from the options available to them in terms of spirituality and meaning and purpose, but it seems to bring also a loss of parts of the story.

Visiting the chapel and almshouses of Saint Mary Magdalene, the beautiful garden led to an enclosure beyond. On the south wall of the enclosure, there hung a painting that might have been a scene from a book of children’s Bible stories.

There must be countless such illustrations that attempt to capture the tales of a First Century itinerant Judean preacher and his small groups of followers. Except this one was different, in this one the figures are set against the background of Glastonbury Tor. To the right lies Sedgemoor, but as it might have been in more recent times, for in the First Century it would have been water and marshland. Beyond the moor lie hills, among which is the one where my own village stands.

This is Glastonbury, this is the place to which Joseph of Arimathea is said to have brought the chalice from the Last Supper, this is the place where Joseph is said to have brought Jesus as a boy.

A woman with a glitter star in the middle of her forehead stood beside me.

‘Blake’s Jerusalem.’ I said.

She looked at me, a confused expression.

‘The Last Night of the Proms, do you know the lines?’

And did those feet in ancient times
Walk upon England’s mountains green?
And was the holy Lamb of God,
On England’s pleasant pastures seen?

The woman shook her head. ‘I’m sorry, I don’t know it.’

There was a temptation to ask how much of the Glastonbury tradition meant anything without the Jerusalem allusions. Perhaps glittery stars and neo-paganism have supplanted the more ancient stories. Perhaps embracing everything means a loss of some things.

Posted in Out and about | 2 Comments

Musical accompaniment to crime

My supervisor told a story of academic intrigue.

‘It sounds something that might make a plot for an episode of Morse, culminating with a murder among the dons.’

‘Goodness me, no’, he laughed, ‘it was Hull. It w, more soapas more Vera than Morse‘.

Heartbeat, then?’

‘Oh no. That’s the wrong part of Yorkshire, that’s North Yorkshire. It doesn’t do to get them confused’.

‘What about Inspector George Gently? No, though, I think he is up in Vera’s patch’.

We moved on to the proper business of the meeting.

Perhaps there is a gap in the television drama schedules for a detective from Hull – a gritty rugby league fan who could quote lines from Philip Larkin and solve murders committed by jealous academics.

Sitting watching an episode of Heartbeat, it seemed a piece of harmless light entertainment, more soap opera than crime drama. Some of the characters are closer to those from a comedy programme than to the grim social realism of the BBC 4 Saturday night offerings from Scandinavia.

A striking thing about Heartbeat is the music. Snatches of 1960s tunes provide a backdrop to each of the stories. Someone familiar with 1960s discography would be able to give the date intended for each of the episodes, assuming that the music is selected with attention to detail.

The music is familiar, or it is familiar, at least, to someone of sixty-one years of age. The tunes are ones that have been played on countless occasions since their release more than fifty years ago.

The artists, many of whom are now in their eighties and some of whom are still touring, must have earned considerable royaltoes on the songs that have received so much air time. No artist recording in the 1960s could possibly have imagined that three minute recordings issued on 7 inch vinyl discs would still be earning them a regular income in their old age.

A series like Heartbeat could not be made about the 2020s.

In part, how would one make a series about the work of police officers in a rural community when there are no police officers to be seen? Once, villages had constables resident among the local population, each small town had a station. Everyone knew the name of the local members of the constabulary. Now the police have disappeared from rural areas.

In part, there is no music that would be remembered by more than a small element of the population. Pop music no longer exist.

A musical accompaniment to a crime series now would not sound like Heartbeat.

Posted in Out and about | 1 Comment

What is old?

I love ITV 3. There is a constant recycling of detective series without reference to date or sequence or age.

Vera drives a Land Rover that never seems to be replaced and drinks whisky in a manner that must eventually take its toll. Inspector Barnaby may be either of his manifestations, his sergeants may be drawn from a wide selection, and the colossal death toll in Midsomer continues to mount. Law and Order continues to be screened without cognizance of changes that may have affected the Crown Prosecution Service.

If there is a series that is mindful of the passage of time, it is Morse, with its Lewis sequel, and its Endeavour prequel.

Randomly, and without explanation for its scheduling, the very first episode of Endeavour was screened last night. It is the one where the youthful Police Constable Morse arrives for the first time at Cowley Police Station to join Oxford City Police.

The final moment of that episode is the one that is the most memorable. Even the music from Puccini’s Madam Butterfly doesn’t capture the mood of the passage of time as does one second at the end.

Driving Inspector Thursday’s black Jaguar, the young Morse in his Shaun Evans incarnation glances into the rearview mirror. Looking back at him is the Morse whom he becomes, the unmistakeable eyes of John Thaw.

It is a moment of continuity, a moment when past, present and future become one.

Sometimes there are moments when shaving in the morning when I look into the mirror and there is a glimpse of the person I once was. Perhaps life would have been lived more wisely if I had been able to look into the mirror and been able to see the person I would become.

Perhaps what matters is not the appearance, but what one thinks. Perhaps age is not something that can be gauged in a rearview mirror, but is something on the inside.

ITV’s West Country news bulletin yesterday evening carried a story of two ninety year old friends from the Bristol area who must look in the mirror and seem someone very different from the person looking back. The television cameras covered the weeken activities of the duo, one had gone wing walking and the other had taken part in a sky dive.

To contemplate those activities must demand extraordinary physical health for someone who is ninety, but more than that, it must reflect an extraordinary attitude.

To look in the mirror at ninety and still retain an appetite for the extreme would be a delightful way of dealing with the inexorable passage of time.

Posted in The stuff of daily life | Leave a comment

A rare visit to church

It was the retirement service for the local vicar today, spending twelve years in the parishes, she has been someone who understood the words community and service, someone who had become much loved for her gentle loving kindness, particularly her care for those isolated in lockdown.

A rare attender at church services these days, I drove to the service.

It was being held in Langport church, a building now closed for regular services and in the care of a body called the Churches Conservation Trust. Last year, I saw it advertised as holiday accommodation, it was a delight to see it restored, for a short time, to is proper use.

There is no parking at Langport church, and even if there were it has become difficult to access since the road from the Muchelney side of the town was closed after the idiotic driving of a Heavy Goods Vehicle brought the large lorry into contact with the Hanging Chapel that stands aside the road. (Are drivers and their employers ever made amenable for the costs they inflict on communities?)

Parking at Huish Episcopi church, I joined the flow of people walking the few hundred yards to Langport church. From the church tower in Langport came the sound of the peal of bells. At the church door, a queue of people had formed, each person stopping to wish the vicar well. Inside, the church was filled, only by walking to the front of a side aisle did I find a seat.

Sitting in the church, there was a moment of timelessness.

Today was the anniversary of the civil war battle which brought a clash of a 10,000 strong Parliamentary army with a force of 7,000 men on the crown side. What tragedies had been played out that day? How many people had come into this building to pray for deliverance from the violence?

How many other moments had these walls witnessed?

The congregation sang with enthusiasm and joined loudly in the responses to the prayers. Yes, there were plenty of octagenarians, but there were also dozens of primary school aged children and their families.

A girl of six or seven years of age sat nearby sang a Christmas carol to herself. Her church attendance was obviously as frequent as my own.

The Gospel reading for today was the parable of the Good Samaritan, a fitting reading for a farewell to a vicar who had sought to live by the spirit of Jesus’ teaching.

There were to be speeches and lunch to follow. Being a stranger in their midst, I picked up my jacket and nodded in apology to those around.

Walking back towards Huish, I thought I understood how my family had spent so long in this timeless place. As if in a moment of perfect synchronicity, a farm jeep pulled up alongside me and one of my uncles greeted me

Posted in Out and about | 1 Comment

Civil war rights

The Battle of Naseby in June 1645 and the Battle of Langport in July 1645 marked the destruction of the armies of King Charles and the First Civil War drifted to a conclusion the following year when the Scots handed Charles over to Parliament,

In the period that followed, there was discussion of what sort of socirty the members of the Parliamentary army wanted.

Read the accounts of The Putney Debates now and they recall that the men who fought for Cromwell in battles like those at Naesby and Langport were men who had set out with high ideals.  The soldiers were evangelical Christians, they were men whose daily lives were shaped by Scripture and prayer.  They believed everyone should pursue their own conscience, that no government had a right to impose religion.

In An Agreement of the People issued on 28th October 1647, they declared:

That matters of religion and the ways of God’s worship are not at all entrusted by us to any human power, because therein we cannot remit or exceed a tittle of what our consciences dictate to be the mind of God, without wilful sin.

The Levellers, the soldiers who took part in the Putney Debates, had no place for an established church, no place for secular powers being used to dictate people’s religious beliefs or their practices.

The Levellers’ vision extended much further than matters of religious belief, there was a belief in universal suffrage, an idea that their opponents claimed could only lead to anarchy and an end to private property. On 29th October 1647, after a morning prayer meeting, the soldiers had resumed their debates. Colonel Thomas Rainsborough, who became a heroic figure for the Levellers, declared during the debate:

For really I think that the poorest hee that is in England hath a life to live, as the greatest hee; and therefore truly, Sr, I think itt clear, that every Man that is to live under a Government ought first by his own Consent to put himself under that Government; and I do think that the poorest man in England is not at all bound in a strict sense to that Government that he hath not had a voice to put Himself under.

The poorest man has as much a life to live as the richest man: a declaration of the dignity and rights of every person, rights that were about more than a matter of words or principles, rights that had direct political implications.

Neither Cromwell nor the Crown would entertain the introduction of such rights. The oppression of the Commonwealth would be followed by the oppression of the Restoration.

Posted in This sceptred isle | 2 Comments